IntermediateFramePortalLoad combinationWind

Portal frame under combined gravity and wind

Both previous load cases at once. Superposition means the effects simply add — and gravity turns out to be what keeps the windward footing on the ground.

Figure 1.A pinned-base portal carrying gravity and wind simultaneously.
Given
Span
6 m
Height
4 m
10 kN/mgravity, on the rafter
15 kNwind, at the eaves
Bases
pinned
1

Part 1 — Both load cases on one frame

Gravity along the rafter, wind at the eaves.

The familiar pinned portal, then both loads together:

N 0,0 N 0,4 N 6,4 N 6,0 M 1 2 M 2 3 M 4 3 S 1 P S 4 P

L 2 -10 P 2 15 0

A 10 kN/m gravity UDL on the rafter and a 15 kN lateral load at the windward eaves — the two cases solved separately in the previous examples, now acting at the same time.

Figure 2.Gravity and wind together on the same pinned-base portal.
2

Part 2, step 1 — Linear analysis means the cases simply add

Worth checking rather than assuming.

This is a linear elastic analysis, so the combined answer is the sum of the separate ones. Gravity alone gave a peak member moment of about 20.8 kN·m; wind alone about 30.0 kN·m. Together:

The solver returns 50.73 kN·m — superposition, confirmed numerically rather than taken on trust.

This is exactly why load cases are analysed separately and combined afterwards: each case is solved once, and every combination the code asks for is then arithmetic rather than a fresh analysis.

Figure 3.The combined case — the gravity reactions with the wind couple superposed on top of them.
3

Part 2, step 2 — Gravity rescues the uplift

The reason a code asks for combinations rather than worst cases.

Under wind alone, one base wanted to lift: the vertical reactions were a pure couple of ±10 kN. Add gravity’s 30 kN of compression at each base and the picture changes completely — the reactions are now 20 and 40 kN.

Both bases stay in compression. The holding-down bolts have nothing to resist and the footing can be sized for bearing alone.

That is the whole point of a load combination: the governing case for the frame is gravity-plus-wind, but the governing case for the footing may well be wind with a reduced dead load — precisely because gravity is what keeps it down.

Hand calculation vs solver

Verified — hand calculation vs the solver, to round-off
QuantityBy handStructureCalcs
Total vertical reactionwL = 60 kN (wind adds none)60 kN
Total horizontal reaction15 kN (the applied wind)15 kN
Peak member moment≈ 20.8 + 30.0 = 50.8 kN·m50.73 kN·m
Peak swaywind-driven14.09 mm

Every value was worked by hand with the classical method, then checked against this site’s solver — the same engine the Try it button opens. This agreement is re-run automatically on every build.

Now make it yours

Open this exact model in the calculator — then change a load, drag a support, and watch every diagram update in real time. The best way to build intuition is to break it and see what happens.

Take it with you

Export this worked example as a PDF, or download it as a .screport and open it in the Report Builder — the model travels inside the file, so you can reconstruct it, re-solve, and build your own report from it.

Verifying your link…