IntermediateSectionMonosymmetricPublished profile

60E1 railway rail — properties of a real published profile

Most examples show you a method. This one is a test: a profile the engine has never met, taken from a published drawing, checked against the standard that defines it. It also happens to be the clearest section there is for showing why an off-center centroid gives you two section moduli and two different centres.

Figure 1.The 60E1 rail with its centroid marked — 80.9 mm above the base of a 172 mm section.
Given
Profile
60E1formerly UIC 60
Standard
EN 13674-1
Height
172 mm
Foot width
150 mm
Mass
60.21 kg/m
Outline
89 pointsfrom the datasheet drawing
1

Part 1 — Getting a real profile into the tool

A rail is 89 points, and you should not type them.

A rolled steel beam is a handful of dimensions — depth, flange width, two thicknesses, two radii — so the Section Calculator can build one from the published table. A rail is not like that. Its head is three different radii blended together, its web is a curve rather than a straight line, and its foot tapers at 1:20. There is no short list of numbers that reconstructs it.

So this example does what you would do in practice, and what we did to build it:

  1. Open the manufacturer’s datasheet PDF for the rail.
  2. Extract the DRAWING, not the dimension labels — the profile is vector art in the file, and the outline itself is the data. On Linux, pdftocairo -svg rail.pdf rail.svg.
  3. Scale it by ONE published dimension (here the 172 mm height) and check a second one falls out right.
  4. Type the outline in as a polyline, or open a .scsection that already holds it.

The Try it button at the foot of this page loads the finished profile, so you can measure it, dimension it, and change it without typing 89 coordinates.

Figure 2.The 60E1 profile: 172 mm tall, 150 mm across the foot, 89 points around the boundary.
2

Part 2, step 1 — The centroid is nowhere near mid-height

And on this section, that is the whole story.

The rail is 171.8 mm tall, so mid-height is about 86 mm. The centroid sits at ȳ = 80.85 mm — close, but the closeness is a coincidence of this particular profile, not a rule.

A rail is monosymmetric: symmetric left-to-right, and not at all symmetric top to bottom. A heavy head, a thin web, a wide flat foot. The centroid lands where the areas balance:

Published EN 13674-1 gives 80.92 mm. The tool computes 80.85 mm — -0.08%.

Figure 3.The centroid marked on the profile, with the world axes. Symmetric about x; nothing like symmetric about y.
3

Part 2, step 2 — One I, but TWO section moduli

The consequence of an off-center centroid.

Because the centroid is not at mid-height, the head and the foot are different distances from it. The section therefore has two different elastic moduli about the same axis:

Here Z_top = 332825 mm³ and Z_bot = 374538 mm³ — the foot’s modulus is about 13% larger, because the foot is closer to the centroid than the head is.

The tool reports the governing as the smaller of the two — 332825 mm³ — because that is the fiber that reaches its limit first under a sagging moment.

4

Part 2, step 3 — The plastic neutral axis is somewhere else again

Equal AREAS, not equal first moments.

Turn on PNA and a second horizontal line appears, at 82.94 mm rather than the centroid’s 80.85 mm. They are different axes answering different questions:

  • The elastic centroid is where the first moment of area vanishes — the axis the section bends about while it stays elastic.
  • The plastic neutral axis divides the section into two equal AREAS — the axis it bends about once the whole section has yielded.

They coincide only on a doubly symmetric section. On this rail they are 2.091 mm apart, which is why 452639 mm³ is not simply times a tidy shape factor.

Figure 4.Two centers, one section: the elastic centroid (solid) and the plastic neutral axis (dashed).

The tool against EN 13674-1

Verified — hand calculation vs the solver, to round-off
QuantityBy handStructureCalcs
Area7,670 mm² (published)7665 mm² · -0.07%
Ix30.383 × 10⁶ mm⁴ (published)30.282 × 10⁶ mm⁴ · -0.33%
Iy5.123 × 10⁶ mm⁴ (published)5.109 × 10⁶ mm⁴ · -0.28%
Centroid from base80.92 mm (published)80.85 mm · -0.08%
Overall height172 mm (published)171.8 mm
Foot width150 mm (published)150 mm

Every value was worked by hand with the classical method, then checked against this site’s solver — the same engine the Try it button opens. This agreement is re-run automatically on every build.

Now make it yours

Open this exact model in the calculator — then change a load, drag a support, and watch every diagram update in real time. The best way to build intuition is to break it and see what happens.

Take it with you

Export this worked example as a PDF, or download it as a .screport and open it in the Report Builder — the model travels inside the file, so you can reconstruct it, re-solve, and build your own report from it.

Verifying your link…